tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22587889.post115044432516575245..comments2024-02-11T13:21:47.930+05:30Comments on Ruminations of a Programmer: Does Ruby need AOP ?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01613713587074301135noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22587889.post-17213247008770341672012-07-22T19:16:59.273+05:302012-07-22T19:16:59.273+05:30How do you feel about this, in 2012? I'm inte...How do you feel about this, in 2012? I'm interested in hearing your insight.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22587889.post-59610632022572908072010-10-12T19:19:39.335+05:302010-10-12T19:19:39.335+05:30Totally agree with you.
It would kick ass to have...Totally agree with you.<br /><br />It would kick ass to have 1 AOP framework with its own semantics - not everyones different way with metaprogramming.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22587889.post-24985335676336712242007-09-20T16:03:00.000+05:302007-09-20T16:03:00.000+05:30awesome post, im going to do a small presentation ...awesome post, im going to do a small presentation on AOP and Ruby and this has been a great help!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com